Pauline Hanson’s Zionist Connection – Malcolm Roberts, The Ziopatriots and the Liberals in the Mix

By Dr. Jim Saleam

|

Pauline Hanson says some basic truths about Australia’s Muslim minority. Yes, they don’t seem to respect Australian values. Yes, some would live by Sharia law. Yes, some try to impose Halal food upon one and all.  And agreed, there is a danger in allowing Muslim immigration and there is a real and present danger from Muslim terrorists.

Yet, she has also said: her party has Muslim members and she only opposes radical Islam and not Islam in Australia; her programme says that refugees (sic), many of whom are Muslims, may ultimately become citizens.

Talk about inconsistency! What is this ‘populist’ politician really all about? Indeed, it is enough to cause patriotic people to turn away. Many are.However, there is something else.  I think it is sinister.

Yet, she has also said: her party has Muslim members and she only opposes radical Islam and not Islam in Australia; her programme says that refugees (sic), many of whom are Muslims, may ultimately become citizens.

Essentially, Pauline Hanson has been deathly silent about the origins of the current Muslim terrorist danger and for all of her ‘speaking up for people’, there is nothing, absolutely nothing in her pronouncements about our government’s knowledge of the financial and military connections between our ‘allies’ (the USA, Britain, France, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Qatar and Turkey) and the rise of ISIS and the on-going terrorism of al Qaeda. These connections play out right now on the Syrian battlefields as the Russians are telling us.

Then, there is nothing about the perverted attempt to overthrow President Assad in Syria, courtesy of our allies, employing these very terrorists and other stooges who have reduced the country to chaos – causing millions of ‘refugees’ to have streamed out of the country. There is nothing about President Assad wanting those refugees to return home. If terrorism can be spread by ‘blowback’, Australians have the right to know. Blowback? If the terrorists were, or maybe still are, occasionally in the employ of ‘the West’ and its allies with all the problems that can cause, it is a scandal of the highest order. It begs a thousand questions.

Essentially, Pauline Hanson has been deathly silent about the origins of the current Muslim terrorist danger and for all of her ‘speaking up for people’, there is nothing, absolutely nothing in her pronouncements about our government’s knowledge of the financial and military connections between our ‘allies’ (the USA, Britain, France, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Qatar and Turkey) and the rise of ISIS and the on-going terrorism of al Qaeda.

This material would be dynamite if launched in the Senate. Of course, Pauline Hanson is in the Senate and reasonably knows of the data. We can only conclude that the Hansonites do not want this information to get wider coverage. Do they fear its release? Is that because it eats right into the fabric of state decision-making and this is a dangerous subject to talk about? Is it easier just to make noises about ‘Islam’?

Meantime, Australia First Party and its friends struggle to get the information into the public arena as best we can. This party will get better at it. We are obliged to note that the Hansonites shun this truth. We have come to suspect it goes beyond opportunism and fear of condemnation by the big parties and the media.

The problem may lie deep in the belly of the new One Nation. For us, it is the Zionist connection of the new One Nation which is the issue here.

I must now refer to Malcolm Roberts.

MALCOLM ROBERTS ENTERS THE GAME

The original One Nation party had its Svengali in David Oldfield, an opportunist but still a Liberal and friend of Tony Abbott, who set it up alongside Hanson. As he was later to say in the New South Wales Legislative Assembly, “the aim of One Nation was to make the Liberal Party more right wing”. Or as we might say: the aim was to anchor dissent close to the Liberal Party so at a certain point, the Liberals could rein it in – as they did. He kept Hanson to the straight and narrow and even when the Liberals (through Abbott in fact) decided to deflate their own balloon by gaoling Hanson, the Svengali escaped prosecution.

The new Svengali is Malcolm Roberts (aka ‘Mad dog Mal’) who, if he is to be believed, has said that he may not even vote the same way as Pauline Hanson in the Senate and he has told her so. Such latitude to an underling!  As Hanson tells it, she met him and approached him to join her Senate ticket. We might better suspect that the two were melded by the interests who lurk behind Roberts. Thanks to further investigations, even those of mainstream media in their capacity of ‘’reporting’, these interests have become known.

The new Svengali is Malcolm Roberts who, if he is to be believed, has said that he may not even vote the same way as Pauline Hanson in the Senate and he has told her so. Such latitude to an underling! 

Malcolm Roberts entered the comity of so-called ‘right wing groups’ in Queensland via his role as a member of the Galileo movement. This movement, founded in February 2011, is the ‘climate sceptic’ group, financially supported by billionaire oligarch, Gina Rinehart. Its patron was radio impresario Alan Jones, a Liberal and (pseudo) Hanson supporter.

The climate sceptics were of great interest to the Liberals and to the conservatives in general. In particular, during the period after the elevation of Julia Gillard to the position of Prime Minister in 2010, a Liberal mobilisation got under way with the intention of driving her from office and installing a new Liberal Party government. I am not arguing here one way or the other that the climate sceptics may have a point or two, I am merely saying that they were of service (and still are) to the Liberals and those who finance them. They are certainly of service of Gina Rinehart who wants to export coal and other minerals for the ‘dirty’ and polluting factories of China.

For some time, Tony Abbott marketed himself as a sceptic and Senator Cory Bernardi certainly so. Their status inter-links them with a mass of well-meaning conservatives who can then be manipulated. The Liberal connected Institute of Public Affairs has from its inception, played a shadowy role in organizing the climate sceptics. And today, Abbott and Bernardi feature strongly in the ‘conservative movement’, they romance Pauline Hanson (who has forgiven Abbott for gaoling her) and then provide focus for little would-be patriots of all sorts.

The climate sceptics were of great interest to the Liberals and to the conservatives in general. In particular, during the period after the elevation of Julia Gillard to the position of Prime Minister in 2010, a Liberal mobilisation got under way with the intention of driving her from office and installing a new Liberal Party government.

A Climate Sceptics Party had already formed in 2007 and a “club” came into being in the Sydney suburb of Five Dock to provide a venue for them. Libertarians and other conservatives (sic) flocked there. Ziopatriots (a patriot who believes support for Israel and Zionism defines his worldview) found the atmosphere congenial. Supporters of Ziopatriot Nick Folkes and his Party for Freedom would attend after 2012. Bob Vinnecombe, a former One Nation official and Ziopatriot, the half-mad Lex Stewart (one of the founders of the original One Nation) and many other identities operated out of there.

Malcolm Roberts and (now Senator) Brian Burston during the 2016 election campaign used it as a venue to rally their foot soldiers. The Sydney Traditionalists, a student-centred Liberal group, also sent members there; these ‘Trads’ were also friends of Bernardi and had connections with the shadowy Howard Crawford of the Liberal Party’s dirty tricks group. We shall meet Crawford again. Basically, such a club provides the grounds for cross-fertilisation and common action, a germ pool for new initiatives. It will attract that sort of ‘conservative’ who will suggest action outside the Liberal Party is necessary to ‘save the country’, but through these connections is subordinated to Liberal party requirements – which are to corral this dissent and remobilize it to serve Liberal interests.

In Brisbane, the field was well stacked with similar stooges. A grassroots activism developed. Malcolm Roberts spoke at the anti-Carbon Tax and anti-illegal immigration rally on June 25, 2011, at Logan south of Brisbane. It was organized by the Australian Patriots Defence Movement an umbrella co-ordination group. As far as can be determined, this was the first mention of the term ‘Patriots’ in a movement title and it was the first time the term ‘Defence’ made an appearance. That was a portent of the future.

Malcolm Roberts spoke at the anti-Carbon Tax and anti-illegal immigration rally on June 25, 2011 at Logan south of Brisbane. It was organized by the Australian Patriots Defence Movement an umbrella co-ordination group. As far as can be determined, this was the first mention of the term ‘Patriots’ in a movement title and it was the first time the term ‘Defence’ made an appearance.

Two meetings occurred. The first was at the Vietnam Veterans’ Club in July followed by another in August. The Tea Party (Tea: taxed enough already, formed in 2010) leader David Goodridge is now a primary adviser to Malcolm Roberts (he was also close to the Liberals and was noted to hand out how to vote cards for them) and a part of the inner core of One Nation (Courier Mail, October 1 2016), a fact which helps centre Hanson (as we shall see) in the Zionist camp. The Tea Party led a number of anti-carbon tax rallies across the country in 2010 and 2011, one of which in Canberra was graced by ‘conservative’ Tony Abbott. Of course, it was.

Why do all these Zios look like close relatives of Charles Manson?

Goodridge proposed at these two Brisbane meetings resolved that Queensland Patriots (sic) would be rallied to oppose the extreme-left controlled Boycott, Disinvestment and Sanctions movement (BDS) which focused on Israel’s occupation of the rump Palestine in the West Bank and Gaza. The BDS intended to picket the Max Brenner Chocolate Shops throughout Australia, given Brenner’s business links to the Israeli Army.

The Tea Party led a number of anti-carbon tax rallies across the country in 2010 and 2011, one of which in Canberra was graced by ‘conservative’ Tony Abbott. Of course it was.

Michael Darby, a member of the Liberal Party and prominent ‘conservative’ in New South Wales, said: “Inspired by two splendid ladies, Natalie and Dani Keyes, and operating under the guidance of members of the Australian Tea Party led by David Goodridge, the numerically (and morally) superior defenders included people of all ages from teens to septuagenarians, Logan Councillors Hajnal Black and Sean Black, Malcolm Roberts of the Galileo Movement and James Darby of SBandEP.org. Several Defenders had South African accents and a dozen or more were born in Israel — God bless Israel.”

Another group said of the Left: “They were met by a larger counter-protest of over 60 people from a diverse range of groups such as the Australian Tea Party, the Australian Patriots Defence Movement, student groups, Israeli community members and politicians.”

Supporting Israel and defending the Australian nexus with it are clearly goals of this new conservative mobilization. These Ziopatriots cannot conceive of a new patriotism without a reference to Israel and they are aggressive in that idea.

Malcolm Roberts, Councillor Sean Black (now a speechwriter for Hanson and member of the inner-core of One Nation and a former anti-carbon tax movement activist) and the Queensland University Liberal Club activists, all endorsed Zionism and Israel. A photograph and video of Roberts places him at the scene.

Supporting Israel and defending the Australian nexus with it are clearly goals of this new conservative mobilization. These Ziopatriots cannot conceive of a new patriotism without a reference to Israel and they are aggressive in that idea. To a participant in these Brisbane meetings, David Goodridge confided the importance of countering the extreme-left, the Left generally and the Greens over the BDS issue. The BDS movement was explained as “anti-Semitism” and “fascist” and it was explained that all patriots and conservatives should oppose BDS and support Israel. When Australia First Party was mentioned, Goodridge replied that they were “fascist” too. Goodridge drew the connection between Islam, Islamism and Muslim migrants and the danger they posed in Australia for Zionism and Israel.

A CONSTELLATION OF LIBERAL SATELLITES

At the same moment that the anti BDS people were rallying the troops in Brisbane, a group of Sydney-siders were on the same ball. The Brisbane and Sydney crews were known to each other through the anti-carbon tax movement.

The Sydney group came together in numbers on September 10, 2011. At that time, Darrin Hodges and Nick Folkes were inside the Australian Protectionist Party, trying to force it into support for Zionism. They joined up with nascent followers of the ‘Australian Defence League’ (ADL) and others to counter protest a BDS group at a Brenner chocolate shop in inner-city Newtown. Indeed, there is some evidence Hodges and Folkes were actually the initial founders of ADL in Australia, but the group moved into independent status quick enough.

At the same moment that the anti BDS people were rallying the troops in Brisbane, a group of Sydney-siders were on the same ball. The Brisbane and Sydney crews were known to each other through the anti-carbon tax movement.

Daphne Anson, Jewish historian and rabid Zionist (the name is a pseudonym), lavished praise upon the Hodges / Folkes group for their participation in the Newtown demo. This was encouraging for them.

Folkes hoped to get control of the ADL so he could have the link to the English Defence League and when Hodges, a wrecker and smear monger of the first rank, just walked out and quit politics Folkes still continued his approach, targeting nationalists with unremitting misinformation and outright smear. He would call nationalists “Nazis” in the hope he would be noticed as the sort of patriot (sic) Zionists could trust. He even took to writing in the letters’ columns of Jewish community newspapers. Folkes courted the support of the New South Wales Jewish leadership which is almost Zionist to a man and it is understood he had telephone conversations with prominent Zionists assuring him of his support for Israel and the need for common anti-Islam action. Did he also promise to keep misrepresenting nationalists?

Folkes courted the support of the New South Wales Jewish leadership which is almost Zionist to a man and it is understood he had telephone conversations with prominent Zionists assuring him of his support for Israel and the need for common anti-Islam action. Did he also promise to keep misrepresenting nationalists?

Stunning research by the former leader of the British National Party Nick Griffin showed conclusively that the English Defence League was a Zionist funded operation (with dollars from America) which was designed to twist the anti-immigration movement in England into an anti-Muslim movement. It was schemed it would then target other groups which were nationalist for disruption and it would create a pro-Israel propaganda for the public. The Australian case showed similarities.

However, rather than put their eggs all in one basket, the ADL was hived into two, an official ADL and the Patriots Defence League of Australia (PDLA), based largely in Brisbane and a descendant of the Goodrich-connected group. In Sydney, the notorious Ralph Cerminara took leadership of ADL in 2013 and maintained its website and conducted demonstrations. He occasionally demonstrated with Folkes in tow. Ziopatriot and multiracialist Shermon Burgess also made his first appearance in ADL around that time.

Folkes hoped to get control of the ADL so he could have the link to the English Defence League and when Hodges, a wrecker and smear monger of the first rank, just walked out and quit politics Folkes still continued his approach, targeting nationalists with unremitting misinformation and outright smear. He would call nationalists “Nazis” in the hope he would be noticed as the sort of patriot (sic) Zionists could trust.

For the next couple of years, the anti-Islam movement was amorphous and the province of these Defence leagues and other minor groups – and Folkes’ Freedomites. Then, in November 2014, a call went out for ‘Reclaim Australia’ rallies across the country to be held in April 2015. Reclaim would challenge the growth of Islam in Australia and its ‘danger’ to the world. It was a galvanizing moment.

The founders of the Reclaim group were non-patriot-connected people Wanda Marsh and John Oliver – but also Shermon Burgess. Catherine Brennen joined as an organizer and has said that she had never been politically active, but that the 2014 siege at the Sydney Lindt Café was a “turning point” for her. But given the Burgess link, at once the ADL, PDLA and similar groups were all over it. Pauline Hanson and Liberal Federal MP George Christensen, who to this day stays very friendly to Hanson, were speakers at its rallies in 2015. At a Brisbane rally, Hanson was shepherded by one Scott Moerland, a rabid Zionist sympathizer.

For the next couple of years, the anti-Islam movement was amorphous and the province of these Defence leagues and other minor groups – and Folkes’ Freedomites. Then, in November 2014, a call went out for ‘Reclaim Australia’ rallies across the country to be held in April 2015. Reclaim would challenge the growth of Islam in Australia and its ‘danger’ to the world. It was a galvanizing moment.

What am I saying about this anti-Islam movement? Simple. Whatever the immediate origin of Reclaim, it was the perfect Liberal Party ‘movement’ satellite. It would discuss immigration as essentially a ‘Muslim’ matter and condemn those who said otherwise. It would favour diversity minus Islam as its social principle and dub nationalists as ‘racists’ or ‘Nazis’ for saying the Australian identity was ‘White’.

It would proclaim Israel a friend of Australia and condemn all those who criticised Israel. It would suggest Australia’s involvements in the Middle East were good things that were fighting ‘Islam’. With these blinkers, seeing the truths about the overthrow of Saddam Hussein or Colonel Gaddafi or the attempt at President Assad (that these things fuelled Islamism and terror and immigration and that these rulers were secular), was next to impossible and if ‘Islam’ was the enemy, then Zionism in Israel had open slather to wage war with it.

What am I saying about this anti-Islam movement? Simple. Whatever the immediate origin of Reclaim, it was the perfect Liberal Party ‘movement’ satellite. It would discuss immigration as essentially a ‘Muslim’ matter and condemn those who said otherwise. It would favour diversity minus Islam as its social principle and dub nationalists as ‘racists’ or ‘Nazis’ for saying the Australian identity was ‘White’. It would proclaim Israel a friend of Australia and condemn all those who criticised Israel.

This witches’ brew of rubbish was just too perfect, too crafted, too honed, to have fallen out of the sky. It was the product of a coven within. As a mass of new persons attached themselves, people from the patriot scene, it was clear it would not challenge the political order (it never said it would) but demand of ‘our’ politicians that they stand up and oppose ‘Islamisation’ That was more than convenient to the Liberals who had uses for it.

THE SATELLITE PAULINE HANSON’S ONE NATION PARTY

The Reclaim movement had the activist intervention of Christian Zionist Pastor Danny Nalliah and his Rise Up Australia Party (RUAP) and the Zionist Q Society. The latter has the connection to Geert Wilders, whose Party For Freedom in Holland is openly funded by Zionists in America and serves Israel as a Trojan Horse in European politics.  Wilders pushes that Europe defends Israel Again; Nick Griffin’s marvellous research for the (European) Alliance for Peace and Freedom has established the parameters of the funding given to the Wilders network.

The Q Society, with the support of Wilders, sponsored the foundation of Australian Liberty Alliance (ALA) which was gestated in 2014, registered as a party in July 2015 and launched by Wilders in person in October 2015. However, satellite politics in Australia has one great fact attached to it. The Liberal Party never operates just one satellite in any field and there are always different ones for other tasks.

The 2016 election campaign and the ‘use’ the conservative anti-Islam movement could be put to in that election — and afterwards — meant a rivalry existed between ALA and the Hanson party. The electoral victor was Hanson. When it came down to it, Hanson who had been employed as a star commentator on Channel 7 for a year had public recognition while ALA did not. Of course, the networks of Q Society and ALA are still there and may now be more closely employed to buttress Hanson at a community level.

If satellite politics is the rule of Liberal Party method, a viable corral for all ‘conservative’ and ‘patriot’ dissent must be constructed all while the public still remains volatile over immigration, globalisation, terrorism, and so forth. If we observe more of these elements drifting into the Hanson party, we can confirm the decision to buttress Hanson will have been taken. Certainly, Hanson maintains a close alliance with Rise Up Australia Party and cannot but approve of its fulsome multiracialism and its Zionism. She also enjoys the frenzied support of bit-players like Folkes and the street level anti-Islam movement. In other words, the satellite party has its own satellites!

The Q Society, with the support of Wilders, sponsored the foundation of Australian Liberty Alliance (ALA) which was gestated in 2014, registered as a party in July 2015 and launched by Wilders in person in October 2015.

The Hanson party has been kept in reserve for a long while to serve as a major satellite if new needs arose. Certainly, One Nation was founded as one, demobilized after 2003, but allowed to drift along as a nothing entity for over a decade till the call was made. Interestingly, when Hanson returned to it in 2013, she also purged it, expelling the nationalist-minded branches in Western Australia and Northern Territory and expelling many individual members elsewhere. Hanson progressively made it clear that she was tame and could be trusted with holding office.

A visible sign of Pauline’s new tame ‘character’ occurred in November 2015 when she rubbed shoulders in Penrith City with Councillor Marcus Cornish. He was running a somewhat bogus anti-mosque campaign that had many locals sucked in. Cornish was a Liberal Party member and had as his aide de camp, Howard Crawford. Hanson came to the Cornish fundraiser to assist such that a case could be financed in the New South Wales courts against the Council’s approval of two mosques in the City.

The money was to go to solicitor Robert Balzola (who lost a string of anti-mosque cases in several cities). Balzola was also a Liberal and a so-called conservative, who just also happened to be close to the Liberty Alliance Senate candidate for Queensland – Bernard Gaynor! Cornish even resigned from the Liberals in 2016 because of the unfair treatment of Abbott by Malcolm Turnbull, but his loyalties remained clear enough. Crawford, who in text messages maintained by Australia First Party, had said of Hanson, “I hate that slut”, still serves Cornish. Infiltrated into Australia First Party in July 2011 (a significant synchronicity, given the activities of Goodridge in Brisbane), Crawford sought to wreck it and weaken in particular the party’s impact in Western Sydney. As could be reasoned, the Liberty Party’s dirty tricks department (aka ‘Australians for Honest Politics’) plans ahead – and plans well. Crawford would most certainly have reported to his masters Hanson’s essential political reliability in their very specialized  anti-Islam crusade.

Hanson progressively made it clear that she was tame and could be trusted with office.

Then even better for Liberal interests. On the way to the Senate this year, Pauline Hanson referred to her “Australia is in danger of being swamped by Asians” remark of 1996 as something she didn’t accept any longer, that “you don’t have to be White to be an Australian” and that “many of my leaders have Asian wives”. This was the ‘diversity minus Islam’ logic of the Reclaim movement, the Freedomites, the Australian Patriots Defence Movement and the rest of them. As far as Hanson was concerned, the danger to Australia did not lie in Asia particularly in China but was purely Islamic’ (sic) in nature. Hanson was ready. In the chaos of system politics which was tearing at Liberal credibility, she was needed. Hanson was able to gather the votes of the well-meaning upset citizens beyond the scope of ALA whose preferences she also harvested. And once in office, she betrayed her oldest followers, proving loyalty beyond doubt, sitting down to do business with Tony Abbott who had managed to imprison her, offering her votes in the Senate to the Liberals, when need be.

The ruse was complete. The safety valve was in full operation.

THE ENDGAME

The new Senator Hanson is surrounded by ex-Liberals, so called conservatives, Ziopatriots and has her own Svengali by her side. The vile hand of Zionism is on the Hanson movement. That means it will run the anti-Islam game as we have described it – to keep people’s eyes off the entire problem of immigration and the globalist forces that inspire it, and off the real genesis of terrorism, off the criminal Middle East politics of our political and military leadership, off the Asianization of Australia.

Would her inner core, if ever challenged, deny their Ziopatriotism? Hardly, although they have not yet been openly challenged. They will be challenged by nationalists.

The effort that has gone into this satellite structure, building its profile, its structure, its financing, suggest it will be around for some time and given people who support it may not readily appreciate the critique made of it, breaking into its supporter base will not be easy.

Nonetheless, the truth is there and the will of the nationalists absolute. Hansonism will not restrain the people’s awakening.