by Dr. Jim Saleam |
In all the furore about a caravan in Sydney loaded with explosives and containing papers indicating Jewish institutions could be targetted and then, the arson and malicious damage of synagogues and the fire-bombing of vehicles connected to Jewish persons and so on, Is it time I applied for a ‘special license’ to commit anti semitism!?
True, nationalists have been suss of all this anti Jewish terrorism stuff. Some Muslim extremists made have had a role, but when we hear that most of it has been done by hired criminals paid by an overseas actor, we have to wonder who was really responsible? Could it have even been the notorious Israeli foreign intelligence service – Mossad? If it was Mossad, the op has certainly been successful, with support for Israel building in all sorts of places.
Further, I am minded that new ‘hate’ laws were passed in Federal Parliament last week and this violence against Jews has been named as justifying them. Moving forward, the laws deal not just violence directed at certain groups which would involve mandatory sentences, but a regimen of thought crimes would also be punished. These veritable thought crimes (and they extend that way not being so much matters of incitement to violence) go well beyond just anti semitism. The media barrage about anti semitism has extended to justify an entire thought crime regime.
According to a blurb from a major party, the new “hate” bill which became Federal law on February 7 would target “the most serious forms of harmful hate speech, namely advocating and threatening the use of force or violence against a group or member of a group or against a place of worship. It is aimed at protecting groups, or members of groups, distinguished by race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status, disability, nationality, national or ethnic origin or political opinion.”
How can one really define all that? It is slippery. The new law is a mixture of anti terrorism and liberal anti hate ideology. It is hate alright. The law represents the hate of the state power against white people, religious people, heterosexual people, women and girls and those of us in this multiculti land who consider ourselves Australians only.
So, I plead with Mr. Mark Dreyfus, Attorney-General of the Commonwealth, to give me a license to commit anti Semitism!
But am I an anti-semite? I say I am an anti-Zionist and have been one consistently for decades. However, I know that it is the propaganda of the press (especially the Australian newspaper, aka Jerusalem Post Downunder) and the propaganda of the Zionists in the Jewish community and amongst other lovers-of-Israel, that anti Zionism is anti semitism. I disagree. Historians would too. Common sense might too, given some Jews are outspoken anti Zionists. So what is the legal boundary? Is this all a trip-wire law where one never knows what is illegal until the Attorney-General says so? Thus, I would like him to say so. And he can do that by licensing me! If he breaks the propaganda wall and says, ‘well, anti Zionism isn’t anti semitism’, he allows (sic) an established tradition of political discourse proper license. That’s what I mean.
My problem is that there are and have been for decades licensed anti semites in Australia. Seemingly, real ones! Then too, there are more recent game-players who made loud noises with de facto immunity.
But first, consider certain Ukrainian propagandists.
I am loath to call them Ukrainian as I consider them an insult to Ukraine. The worst was Stefan Romaniw, a Victorian man who operated Ukrainian (sic) identity politics and who controlled a number of local political and Ukrainian ethic-based community groups.
Now, I observe some Jewish historians say the Holocaust was such a singular event in history that to compare it with other mass murder events is to ‘relativise’ it, which could also amount to anti semitism. Romaniw played this game, in particular through the leadership of the Ukrainian World Congress (UWC). The June 1, 2008 report of the International Coordination Committee of the UWC headed by Romaniw, stated that the great famine in Ukraine induced by Joseph Stalin in 1931 – 1933 created the figure of seven to ten million victims. This was to be promoted as a truth to the Ukraine presidential secretariat and the Ukrainian Institute of National Memory. The victimhood competition evolved in the context of stating the formula “seven to ten is greater than six”. Was he slapped down for this? On the contrary.
Last year, Romaniw died. One commentator said: “The posthumous praise for Romaniw reached Orwellian levels, for example when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hailed the Ukrainian nationalist leader’s inspirational “commitment to the cause of peace.’ On the second Friday of July, flags were flown at half-mast in Romaniw’s home state of Victoria, and its government held a state funeral for him at the Ukrainian Catholic church in North Melbourne. Representing the Prime Minister was Bill Shorten, the Minister for Government Services and former leader of the Labor Party…… We still seek his wise counsel’, Shorten said. “The urge is still there to seek the vague approval from the charismatic leader.’”
He was a “leading light of our proudly multicultural state and nation”, said Jacinta Allan, the Premier of Victoria. It was otherwise noted Stefan Romaniw became an “adviser on ethnic affairs” to the John Howard, and the chairman of the Ethnic Communities Council of Victoria, “the peak body for our state’s migrant and refugee communities.”
Yet, Romaniw was also an ideological follower of Stepan Bandera, the founder of the Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), a body that collaborated (occasionally) with Nazism, which murdered Jews and Polish civilians in the Second World War. Of course, after the Second World War, the OUN collaborated with the CIA and MI-6 across the world. Indeed, Yaroslav Stetsko (Bandera’s deputy) travelled to Cold War Australia and was well received here by Liberal politicians. But to keep up support from his useful-idiot followers, Stetsko was allowed to say: “a clique of international criminals led by Jews, control governments.”
Both Bandera and Stetsko are regarded as heroes in modern Ukraine. Of course in Australia, in 1986, the Australian association of Banderite veterans from the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) published a 110 page assault on Jews: ‘Jewish Bolshevism: Why Is One Holocaust Worth More Than Others’. If the anti anti semites (if I may coin a phrase), don’t know this, then they would be deficient indeed. Mykhailo Ratushny an OUN member who chaired the Kyiv-based Ukrainian World Coordinating Council in recent years, added: “you can already say that … (Stefan Romaniw’s)… leadership in the nationalist movement was on par with figures such as Stepan Bandera and Yaroslav Stetsko”.
Yes, they know all about it. The Ukrainian-Jewish Encounter” (UJE) in Canada gave a cover. A director of the UJE has said this about the modern OUN: “its leaders are strongly pro-Israel and not antisemitic.” Is that why they have that special license? This had to be said to reassure those who baulk a little at the propaganda which comes out of these Ukrainian groups, but who understand the practicality of useful idiots.
Did the Romaniw license have a very special basis? I note that in February 2012, the OUN controlled ‘International Council in Support of Ukraine’, formerly known as the World Ukrainian Liberation Front, informed the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, that “we support regime change in Ukraine as the only viable way for Ukraine to return to its democratic course that is severely undermined by the Yanukovych regime.” This was in the lead up to the US sponsored coup in Ukraine in 2014 which prefigured the war in Ukraine. The OUN supported the Nazi-lookalike Azov battalions and other Ukrainian groups which supported this putsch; they are still excused their neo-nazi-looking external forms, given they ‘Hail Zylensky’, the Jewish president of Ukraine.
I can say too that there still exists in Australia Ukrainian Youth Movement cells and other Azovists who support the criminal war of NATO in Ukraine, but who denounce the Russian government as a “Jew Moscovite” alliance. These useful idiots encourage more to die in a NATO and globalist war. Prime Minister Albanese has involved Australia in this war rather than stay neutral.
With this type of psycho-politics licensed, I cannot see why anti Zionism cannot be accepted as part of normal discourse and I demand the right to preach it!
But, second, let’s consider some activities of the local neo-nazis.
Nationalists know that for almost three years, the Attorney-General has had documentation which could be used to justify a ban on a particular Australian neo-nazi group. This has been shelved and the group was allowed to run.
Some evidence presently exists – and will be the subject of further expose on this website – which shows a link exists between one of neo-nazism’s main players and a shadowy group run out of the USA. This ‘actor’ has pushed an aggressive propaganda upon the group. Yet this Mr. Joel Davis, was previously the close associate of Jewish academics, one of whom authored a major treatise on anti semitism! Once again, we witness the bizarre inter-relationship of anti semitic writings and actions linked to Jewish persons and / or odd agendas.
Some patriotic people are starting to question en mass whether the neo-nazi group is a provocateur structure.
It was, after all, revealed a few years ago, that a former associate of the group claimed to have received money to perform provocations.
Of course a ban on the group might conceal the unpalatable truth.
Again, I say, with this type of pscho-politics licensed, I cannot see why anti Zionism cannot be accepted as part of normal discourse and I demand the right to preach it!
So where are we now?
There is a veritable ‘Dreyfus Affair’ in Australia today. The highest Commonwealth law officer is by default playing games with anti semitism. It is apparently permitted to be used quietly when it serves a political agenda. Further, its alleged existence has been used to broaden the attack upon Australian freedom such that our country has become a police state in the name of fighting terrorism. This is effectively admitted by a former security boss, Mike Pezzullo, who seeks that a National Terrorist Situation be imposed upon Australian politics. He has said: “the declaration of an NTS would open the way for the commonwealth to assume full strategic leadership of the overall anti-Semitism effort..”
Yet, the licensing of anti semitism tells us the political establishment is not speaking truthfully to the people.
The nationalist movement in which Australia First has a significant role, surely opposes all hate crime laws and seeks their repeal. Otherwise, we must struggle to bring these laws into mass contempt.