Muslim whipping in Sydney for drinking alcohol

Normal Aussie Scenario: Christian, a 31 year old Sydney bloke had a few drinks down the pub with his mates last Saturday night.

Abnormal Muslim Scenario: After getting home, at 1am Christian awoke to find four muslims in his bedroom. Three held him down on his bed while another whipped him with an electric cable 40 times!

Why? He had drunk alcohol in Sydney. What the?

‘The 31-year-old was asleep in his apartment in Menton Street Silverwater, in Sydney’s west, when he woke to find four heavily bearded men in his bedroom about 1am Sunday 17-Jul-2011. Three of the intruders restrained him on the bed while the fourth man used a cable to lash him 40 times. Three of the men, in their late teens or early 20s, allegedly held him down on his bed while a fourth, aged between 40 and 50, lashed him about 40 times.

The attack lasted about 30 minutes and left the man covered in welts. The man reportedly told police he had only recently converted to Islam and that fundamental Wahhabi Muslims were punishing him for having a few drinks with friends.’

Man whipped for drinking alcohol in Australia

In backward Islamic countries, drinking alcohol is against islamic ‘sharia law. But it is not against any law in Sydney, Australia. If only Australian diggers who fought for Australian values in two world wars in the middle east could see what is now happening to Australia?

These backward barbaric muslims think they can bring their backward barbaric laws with them to Australia when they immigrate. Well its time Australian Immigration Law reflected Australian values. Number one rule needs to be instant deportation of all the four men involved in imposing sharia law to be sentback to where they came from!

It’s our country, our rules, get it?

Home invasion and cable whipping may be acceptable in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Saudi Arabia and other backward middle eastern Arab countries, but it ain’t in Australia.

And what a nutter, the victim, Christian (if that is his real name), had just converted to Islam. Some initiation! That’ll teach him! Sign here..flog flog flog!

Yet we keep reading in the Sydney papers more and more of ethnic crimes across western Sydney. It has become an ethic ghetto with ethic rules. Sydney has sold its soul to the ethnic minorities who our government encourages to practice their own religion and culture. It’s called ‘multiculturalism’. So when you enter the western Sydney enclave, it’s now ‘spot the Aussie’, efnics dominate, shop signage is unreadable and where Australian rules are ignored and ethnic rules enforced.

One of the muslim whippers aged 20, is Tolga Cifci, from Auburn (western Sydney) who has been charged by Sydney police with aggravated breaking and entering and committing an indictable offence. ‘Tolga Cifci’ – what sort of name is that? Cifci has confessed to inflicting the whipping as punishment under his barbaric ‘religious law’ in the name of Islam, all because Muhammad apparently once flogged a man forty times for drinking alcohol. That was 1500 years ago, yet it doesn’t seem to matter to these backward fanatics.

Henry VIII hung drew and quartered those convicted of treason 500 years ago, and Americans burned witches in Salem just over 300 years ago.

But this is Australia 2011! We don’t lash, stone, hang, draw, quarter or burn people now, kappish?


Problem is Cifci was born in Australia. He is a fanatical ‘Wahabi Muslim’ and a member of the Auburn Mosque in western Sydney.

Auburn Mosque in Sydney

Auburn Mosque in one of Whitlam’s Western Sydney Ghettos


Clearly, his parents have ignored Australian laws and passed on backward foreign customs to their offspring.

So thanks to Australia’s indiscriminate immigration policy, ethnic western Sydney has become a breeding ground for extreme muslims like Cifci and his cohorts.

The Australian Army is wasting its time fighting the muslim fanatics in Afghanistan, while the Department of Immigration is letting Wahabi Muslims in a practice sharia law in our own backyard. 

Sharia Law‘ is a scourge upon Australians

Islamic sharia law is a scary impost to civilised societies like Australia’s.

Islamic Australian flag

It imposes totalitarian dogmas covering most aspects of human life, including requiring compulsory islamic worship, ritual purification, prayers, fasts, charity and pilgrimages to Mecca.

It prescribes harsh rules for all financial transactions, taxation, endowments, laws of inheritance, marriage, divorce, and child care; condones domestic violence between married couples (wife beating). It imposes rules for food and drink (including ritual slaughtering and hunting (halal)), penal punishments, war and peace; military policy, and judicial matters (including witnesses and forms of evidence.

It requires inhuman slitting of animals throats, stoning of adulterers, execution of apostates and blasphemers, repression of other religions like christianity or buddhism.

It’s like the Taliban being invited to fly to Australia and set up in Canberra. I can see a minaret being added to parliament house.

What is a scary reality is that in Britain, where muslims have been allows to immigrate and populate in their hundreds of thousands, Sharia courts have become operating to rule on disputes between Muslims, in defiance of the common law. Five sharia courts have been set up in London, Birmingham, Bradford, Manchester and Nuneaton, Warwickshire, all places where the muslim enclaves have been allowed to fester.

The British government has quietly sanctioned that their rulings are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court.

Previously, the rulings were not binding and depended on voluntary compliance among Muslims.

Lawyers have issued grave warnings about the dangers of a dual legal system and the disclosure drew criticism from Opposition leaders.

Dominic Grieve, the shadow home secretary, said:

“If it is true that these tribunals are passing binding decisions in the areas of family and criminal law, I would like to know which courts are enforcing them because I would consider such action unlawful. British law is absolute and must remain so.”